Why the funding gap exists
Between a first resource and a pre-feasibility study, projects fall between two kinds of capital: speculative money that wants discoveries and development money that wants reserves. Why the gap opens, what it costs, and who fills it.
4 min read
On this page
The hardest money to raise in mining is for projects that are past discovery but not yet proven. Many good deposits stall there, and the ones that get through often pay dearly.
Where the gap is
The gap covers stage 3, maiden resource, and stage 4, resource upgrade: from the first resource estimate to the pre-feasibility study. In the site's illustrative figures, the money needed rises from about $10M to about $40M across these stages, while the chance of a mine is still only 15–45%.
Why it opens
Speculative investors move on. Retail and specialist resource investors are drawn by discoveries and drill results. After the maiden resource, the news flow slows: infill drilling and testwork rarely make headlines. Many sell and look for the next discovery.
Development capital is not ready yet. Banks need a bankable feasibility study. Streaming companies usually want reserves. Majors prefer to buy once the economics are proven. None of them can easily underwrite a project with mostly Inferred resources and no reserves.
The cheques get bigger. Drilling, metallurgy, environmental baselines and the PFS cost much more than discovery drilling, but a junior's market value often falls during this period: the orphan period on the Lassonde curve.
Size thresholds. Many institutional funds cannot hold companies below a minimum market value or trading volume. Small developers fall below that line.
Timelines are long. Two to four years with few catalysts tests investors' patience, and the metal price can turn in the meantime.
What it costs
An invented junior is worth $30M and needs $20M for infill drilling and a PFS.
Either way, existing shareholders give up a large share of the upside to fund a single stage. When markets are weak, the money may not be available at any price, and the project stalls.
What it leads to
- Heavy dilution for shareholders who have already funded discovery.
- Stalled projects: good deposits sit idle for years, waiting for a better market or a buyer.
- Cheap sales: owners sell to larger companies before the studies capture the value.
- Too many burdens: small royalties and stakes sold to survive can make the project harder to finance later.
Who fills it today
| Source | What it offers | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Royalty companies | Non-dilutive money at an early stage | Small cheques; a permanent claim on revenue |
| Strategic stakes by mid-tiers and majors | Money and technical credibility | Often 10–20%, and can deter other buyers |
| Joint ventures | A partner funds the work | The owner gives up control and much of the upside |
| Specialist and private funds | Larger, more patient capital | Few of them, selective, demanding terms |
| Government programmes | Grants, incentives or strategic investment, especially for critical minerals | Vary by country and policy |
| Mergers between juniors | Scale and shared overheads | Do not raise new money on their own |
The typical financing path shows how these fit around the other stages.
What to take away
The funding gap is a structural feature of the industry, not a judgement on any one project. For owners, it raises the cost of capital at the worst moment. For investors, it is where projects are most often mispriced: the odds of success are rising, but the capital to reach the next milestone is scarce. That is the part of the market this platform focuses on.
All figures are invented for illustration. This is educational material, not investment advice.
Key terms
Next in this track
How major miners acquire projectsMajor miners find most new mines by buying them, not discovering them. What they look for, when they step in, the forms a deal takes, and why a buyer can pay more than the market.Related articles
- Junior mining explained in finance termsExploration as an option on a discovery: binary outcomes, power-law returns, dilution and where royalties sit between bonds and equity.The junior mining world5 min read
- Why most projects fail: odds and the Lassonde curveOnly about 1 in 1,000 prospects becomes a mine. Where projects drop out, why, and how a project's value tends to rise, slump and rise again on the way to production.The junior mining world4 min read
- Diversifying across high-risk projectsExploration returns come from a few outcomes, so the number of positions, how they are correlated, how they are sized and how much is kept back for follow-on rounds matter as much as picking projects.Investor playbook4 min read
Educational material only. Nothing here is investment advice or an offer to buy or sell any security or mineral interest.