Skip to content
Lode Exchange

Indigenous rights and community consent

Many deposits lie on land with Indigenous or customary rights. Consultation, consent and benefit agreements shape whether a mine can be built, when, and what it pays to the people affected.

3 min read

On this page

A mine needs the support of the people who live on and around the land. Where that support is missing, legal permits alone have often not been enough to build or operate.

The rules differ by country, but the main reference points are:

  • (FPIC): set out in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Many companies, lenders and industry bodies commit to it, but how far it is binding law varies by country.
  • ILO Convention 169: an international treaty on Indigenous and tribal peoples, ratified by a number of countries, mostly in Latin America, that requires consultation.
  • National law: for example a constitutional duty on the state to consult in some countries, or native title and land rights legislation in others.
  • Lender standards: international lenders and export credit agencies often apply their own standards on Indigenous peoples and resettlement as a condition of finance.

Consultation means being heard. Consent means being able to say no. Much of the uncertainty sits in the gap between the two.

What it looks like in practice

StageTypical engagement
Grassroots and discoveryAgreeing access for exploration; early information sharing; local hiring for field work
Resource and studiesFormal consultation; traditional knowledge in baseline studies; negotiating an agreement
Pre-developmentConsent or support documented; agreements signed; input to the EIA and permit conditions
ProductionAgreement commitments delivered and monitored; grievance processes; regular renegotiation

Impact benefit agreements

An (IBA, also called a community development or benefit-sharing agreement) usually covers:

  • jobs, training and contracts for local businesses,
  • payments: fixed sums, a share of revenue or profit, or equity,
  • environmental monitoring and a role in decisions,
  • protection of cultural sites, and how disputes are settled.

In a model, revenue-linked payments behave much like a royalty, and fixed payments like an operating cost. The terms are often confidential, so investors may have to rely on management's description.

How it changes value

  • Probability: projects without community support face blockades, legal challenges and refused permits. This is the largest effect, and it is concentrated before construction.
  • Timing: consultation that starts late, or fails, delays the EIA and the permits that depend on it.
  • Cash flow: benefit agreements add a cost, usually modest against the risk they reduce.
  • Ongoing risk: operating mines have been halted by disputes, so the risk does not end at the build decision.

What to take away

Ask who holds rights over the land, what the law requires, what the company has done so far, and whether there is a signed agreement. An early project with good relationships is in a stronger position than an advanced one that has not started.

This is educational material, not legal or investment advice. Indigenous rights and the law on them vary widely; take local legal advice.

Key terms

Next in this track

Fiscal regime and stability: royalties, tax and resource nationalismHow a country's royalty, tax and state-ownership terms compare, why they change, and what stability agreements and investment treaties protect against.

Related articles

Educational material only. Nothing here is investment advice or an offer to buy or sell any security or mineral interest.